... Thursday 13th August 2020 03:31 GMT Anonymous Coward. At the heart of these proceedings lies Qualcomm’s so-called “No License, No Chips” (NLNC) policy, whereby it purportedly refuses to sell chips to OEMs that have not concluded a license agreement covering its underlying intellectual property. So apparently Chairman Simon, who is no longer recused in the matter, parted company with his two Republican colleagues on this issue. Qualcomm appealed the FTC ruling, and on August 9, 2020, the U.S. Ninth District Court reversed the FTC decision, vacating the injunction against Qualcomm’s licensing model. The appeals court called Qualcomm’s behavior “hypercompetitive,” but not anticompetitive. This security bulletin is intended to help Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (QTI) customers incorporate security updates in launched or upcoming devices. ... the FTC has now appealed its Qualcomm case to the full Ninth Circuit. Without a doubt, optimism was needed when the FTC sued Qualcomm in 2017, claiming that the chipmaker collected royalties from some of its patents in an anticompetitive manner. Copy. I watched the beginning of the argument this morning, then had to break for an event, and am about to resume. - Aug. 11th 2020 9:56 am PT @michaelpotuck ... business practices were anticompetitive in a case brought by the Federal Trade Commission. References to "Qualcomm" may mean Qualcomm Incorporated, or subsidiaries or business units within the Qualcomm corporate structure, as applicable. More on FTC v. Qualcomm The FTC itself released this press release, stating that the vote to proceed with a petition for rehearing en banc was 3-2. Qualcomm’s procompetitive justification is supported by at least two other companies—Nokia and Dolby—with similar SEP portfolios to Qualcomm’s.17 More critically, this part of the FTC’s argument skips ahead 17 See Br. But a handful of auto companies—Tesla, Honda, Ford and Daimler—joined this time in asking commissioners to keep up the battle. The FTC argued Qualcomm applied an excessive “surcharge” to phone makers, charging them too high a price for patent licenses because the phone makers had to sign the deals to get Qualcomm’s chips. Qualcomm appealed the ruling with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2019 and received a ruling in their favor this year. Re: Future standards . 2020 Hyundai Tucson Review. Appeals judges toss out FTC win: What Qualcomm did to its rivals was 'hypercompetitive, not anticompetitive' An appeals court has reversed an earlier ruling that Qualcomm broke America's antitrust laws, dealing a blow to the FTC, which brought the case. ... Oct 17, 2020 | Top Stories, U.S. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) just can’t take “no, you’re wrong” for an answer. Monday, September 28, 2020. FTC's "No License-No Chips" theory in Qualcomm case may have been too aggressive to be affirmed For the technology industry, the question of whether rival chipset makers are entitled to a FRAND license to Qualcomm's cellular standard-essential patents (SEPs) is the commercially most relevant part of the case. The FTC's case was backed by Apple, which filed its own US antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm. On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Cravath client Qualcomm Incorporated, a leading innovator of cellular technology, in its appeal from an adverse California federal court decision in an antitrust lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). February 2020 Security Bulletin Version 1.0 Published: 02/03/2020. Intel, HP, Tesla and a host of other tech giants have written to America's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) urging it to appeal Qualcomm's legal win against the watchdog in a row over patent fees. ... 2020 6:17 pm. Qualcomm is currently in the midst of a high-profile antitrust case against the FTC. Coverage of federal case FTC v. Qualcomm Inc., case number 19-16122, from Appellate - 9th Circuit Court. FTC unable to explain how Qualcomm's terms impacted rivals ©2021 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its affiliated companies. Court sides with Qualcomm in FTC's appeal of dismissed antitrust case Oct. 28, 2020 2:22 PM ET QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) By: Brandy Betz , SA News Editor 26 Comments Kieren McCarthy in San Francisco Tue 25 Aug 2020 // 20:37 UTC. Some rival chip firms and industry trade groups that supported the FTC's initial antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm in 2017 signed this latest letter as well, including Intel and ACT/The App Association. On November 22, the FTC filed its answering brief in the FTC v. Qualcomm litigation. 5G, FTC Appeal Could be Catalysts to Take Qualcomm Stock to New Highs Despite recent run-up, further upside remains even as QCOM stock approaches 52-week mark By Thomas Niel Jan 21, 2020… On August 11, 2020, a Ninth Circuit panel reversed the District Court for the Northern District of California ’s judgment in FTC v. Qualcomm, Inc. In 2017, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued Qualcomm for violating both sections of the Sherman Antitrust Act by engaging in a number of anticompetitive SEP licensing practices. The FTC argued Qualcomm applied an excessive "surcharge" to phone makers, charging them too high a price for patent licenses because the phone makers had to sign the deals to get Qualcomm's chips. Share. The Federal Trade Commission today filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit requesting rehearing en banc of the August 11, 2020, decision of a panel of that court in the matter of FTC v. Qualcomm Incorporated.. Thursday, February 13, 2020. 2020 Kia Forte Review ... We also know that Apple and Samsung had a "common interest" agreement to work closely with FTC. On Wednesday, October 28, a US appeals court declined to reconsider a decision that dismissed the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) antitrust case against Qualcomm, reported the Wall Street Journal. I may have some thoughts later today or tomorrow. Decision Reversing FTC v. Qualcomm August 27, 2020 . Qualcomm Incorporated includes Qualcomm's licensing business, QTL, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio. The Vergecast discusses Apple’s announcement of their AirPods Max noise-canceling headphones, then talks with Qualcomm president Cristiano Amon about the Snapdragon 888. U.S. FTC Moves for Rehearing of Qualcomm Antitrust Defeat More FILE PHOTO: A Qualcomm sign is shown outside one of the company's many buildings in San Diego, California, U.S., September 17, 2020. The panel held that Qualcomm’s conduct—(a) refusing to license its standards essential patents (SEPs) to rival chipset FTC urged to fight Qualcomm decision 25 AUG 2020 Ford, Daimler, Intel and MediaTek were among a group of 21 which pleaded for the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to contest a successful legal appeal by Qualcomm overturning a patent licensing decision. Video of FTC v. Qualcomm Oral Argument It's available here, starting about thirty minutes in.